Friday, August 21, 2026

Sons of E-Nose

 

They're using graphene sensors, they're using combinatorial coding, they're looking at the timing of the coding via the epithelium and not the spatial organization, and perhaps the most interesting finding, that good smells and bad smells are processed in a totally different way. And I'm sure  artificial noses will have no problem telling the difference between good and bad smells; random note of interest, wild roses, which smell like an intoxicating combination of armpits and vaginas, is not just good, it's great, and I'll bet that would be really confusing to an electronic nose robot that's never had sex before. 

Anyway, then they're looking real carefully at common chordata ancestors and insects alike for clues to how and where our olfactory genetic legacy came from. 

But finally, we may now have the first ever odor map of the epithelium; only took a few hundred years of curiosity.  

Image credit: Oxalic acid crystals during precipitation - James Dvorak - 1975 Nikon Photomicrography Competition 1st Place [link]


Lab-boosted olfactory receptor reveals new insights about how our sense of smell works
Oct 2025, phys.org

Researchers tweaked the C-terminal domains of ORs, resulting in increased OR cell-surface expression and sensitivity (100-fold improvement), and allowing them to "de-orphanize" several ORs, finding matching ligands for them.

via Givaudan the fragrance company: Roger Emter et al, Decoding human olfaction by high heterologous expression of odorant receptors detecting signature odorants, Current Biology (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.09.041


AI-powered electronic nose detects diverse scents for health care and environmental applications
Apr 2025, phys.org

While conventional electronic noses (e-noses) have already been deployed in areas such as food safety and gas detection in industrial settings, they struggle to distinguish subtle differences between similar smells or analyze complex scent compositions.

The research team was inspired by the biological mechanism known as combinatorial coding, in which a single odorant molecule activates multiple olfactory receptors to create a unique pattern of neural signals. 

The novel electronic nose uses a laser to process a thin carbon-based material (graphene) and incorporates a cerium oxide nano catalyst to create a sensitive sensor array. This single-step laser fabrication method eliminates the need for complex manufacturing equipment and enables high-efficiency production of integrated sensor arrays. 

via Convergence Research Advanced Centre for Olfaction at Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology: Hyeongtae Lim et al, Intelligent Olfactory System Utilizing In Situ Ceria Nanoparticle-Integrated Laser-Induced Graphene, ACS Nano (2025). DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5c03601


AI model mimics brain's olfactory system to process noisy sensory data efficiently
May 2025, phys.org

Never heard this analogy before, good one: In this study, the Cornell researchers discovered exactly how the outer layers of the biological system — the olfactory epithelium and the outer layer of the olfactory bulb — perform computations that "create a firewall between the world and the brain."

Next, this development seems to focus on what I will call time instead of space, i.e., we aren't trying to figure out the sensory epithelial map of odor receptors because that doesn't really seem to matter much; instead we are now looking at the timing of the receptor or neuronal activity:

The researchers' work on the olfactory system has also yielded theoretical insights regarding spike-phase coding in the brain — a method by which neurons transmit information by tightly regulating the timing of their communication pulses. This common energy-conservation strategy, it is now clear, can also be leveraged for stable learning and regularization in practical scenarios where data can be noisy and scarce.

So look out for this:
"It suggests interesting parallels to recent work on quantization-aware training in machine learning..."

via Cornell Department of Psychology's Computational Physiology Lab and the AI for Science Institute: Roy Moyal et al, Heterogeneous quantization regularizes spiking neural network activity, Scientific Reports (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-96223-z

Crystal of ascorbic acid - Richard B. Young - 1976 Nikon Photomicrography Competition 11th Place [link]

Nonlinear neural network model reveals how fly brains reduce odor complexity
Jun 2025, phys.org

This is ultimately about dimension reduction - which is a way of reducing the complexity of sensory data coming into our brains.

A relatively simple nonlinear model known as t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) has been developed. 

"The original t-SNE isn't biologically plausible — it's an engineering method rather than a neural network. We rewrote the algorithm so that it mimicked a biological neural network."

The model consisted of three layers, each of which corresponded to specific groups of neurons in the fly brain. It also incorporated dopamine-dependent Hebbian plasticity — the concept that the connection between two neurons will become stronger if they fire at the same time in the presence of dopamine.

via RIKEN Center for Brain Science: Kensuke Yoshida et al, A biological model of nonlinear dimensionality reduction, Science Advances (2025). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adp9048


Fruity fly study uncovers neural circuits for sensing the pleasantness or unpleasantness of odors
Oct 2025, phys.org

Researchers developed a method of recording the activity of all neurons in each brain region of the fruit fly by combining two-photon microscopy and optogenetic cell labeling, and by building a connectome model. The model predicted that unpleasant odors were represented by feedforward excitation of neurons across the lateral horn region, while pleasant odors were derived from additional local inhibition.

The most unexpected result was that the pleasantness and unpleasantness of odors are computed in circuits that are not only separate from each other, but also distinct in connectivity motifs. This means that in terms of the circuit, "good" is not simply the opposite of "bad".

via RIKEN Center for Brain Science: Makoto Someya et al, Distinct circuit motifs evaluate opposing innate values of odors, Cell (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.08.032


Hagfish olfactory genes hint at ancient origins of vertebrate sense of smell
Dec 2025, phys.org

Recall the hagfish is something like the lapmprey;  it's what happens when a fish first becomes a mammal; it's got fins but they're used like legs, and it's got the same nose-brain parts of a fish, but it smells air as well as water, so that's new, phylogenetically speaking. (And the water part of smells is in the TAAR trace amine-associated receptors, which if my memory serves correct do not contain burnt smells, because you can't burn things underwater. And as for the vomeronasal, those aren't supposed to be working for humans so we don't look at those.) 

The researchers' findings reveal that certain olfactory receptor gene families have undergone substantial lineage-specific diversification, suggesting that the vertebrate common ancestor likely possessed a broader and more complex olfactory repertoire than previously proposed.

In vertebrates, four major receptor families mediate olfaction; these include olfactory receptors (ORs), vomeronasal type 1 receptors (V1Rs), vomeronasal type 2 receptors (V2Rs), and trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs). However, the evolutionary origin and early diversification patterns of these receptor classes remain poorly understood.

In this study, the researchers examined the hagfish genome for genes linked to ORs. In total, they identified 48 OR genes, two V1R genes, a surprisingly large set of 135 V2R genes, and no TAAR gene.

Notably, the presence of true V2Rs in hagfish overturns the long-standing assumption that these receptors evolved only in jawed vertebrates.

Conversely, the results of this study suggest that functional V2Rs were already present in the common ancestor of all vertebrates and that they subsequently diversified in a lineage-specific manner.

via University of Tsukuba: Hirofumi Kariyayama et al, Hagfish olfactory repertoire illuminates lineage-specific diversification of olfaction in basal vertebrates, iScience (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.114118

Crystals in quenched steel in a matrix of austenite - Harlan H. Baker - 1977 Nikon Photomicrography Competition 7th Place [link]

Insect-inspired robot tracks odors even with only one working 'antenna'
Mar 2026, phys.org

I'm just here to say it's funny how they don't use the beating wings method, the one just discovered in the past year, for enriching the air sample with a better representation of the ambient air from less sensors (one lost antennae). 

Bio-inspired robotic system can locate odor sources even if one of its two sensors fails: The silkmoth Bombyx mori utilize a bilateral pair of antennae to enable accurate localization of an odor source. But if one antenna is lost, they use the positional angle of their head to dynamically integrate odor location information. 

via National Institute of Informatics, Tohoku University: Shunsuke Shigaki et al, Insect-inspired adaptive behavioral compensation strategy against olfactory sensory deficiency for robotic odor source localization, npj Robotics (2026). DOI: 10.1038/s44182-026-00080-5


Scientists create first-ever 'smell map' of the nose's smell receptors
Apr 2026, phys.org

(This is a very, very big deal in the smell science world)

The team discovered that unlike what scientists had long believed, the neurons expressing these receptors have a high degree of spatial organization: They form horizontal stripes based on receptor type from the top of the nose to the bottom.

"Our results bring order to a system that was previously thought to lack order, which changes conceptually how we think this works."

Moreover, the researchers established that the receptor map in the nose matches up with smell maps in the olfactory bulb of the brain, providing clues about how information moves from the nose to the brain.

Maps have long existed that describe how receptors in the eye, ear, and skin are organized to capture and interpret auditory, visual, and touch information—and scientists have figured out how these maps correspond with those inside the brain.

However, "Olfaction has been the one exception; it's the sense that has been missing a map for the longest time."
(Again, very big deal)
In their new study, the researchers combined single-cell sequencing and spatial transcriptomics techniques to examine around 5.5 million neurons in more than 300 individual mice. The first technique allowed them to identify which smell receptors were expressed by neurons in the nose, and the second let them determine the locations of those receptors.

"This is now arguably the most sequenced neural tissue ever, but we needed that scale of data in order to understand the system."

They discovered that the neurons are organized into tight, overlapping, horizontal stripes from the top of the nose to the bottom based on the type of smell receptor they express. This highly organized receptor map was consistent across the mice and mirrored the organization of smell maps in the brain, just like researchers have observed in vision, hearing, and touch.

via Blavatnik Institute at Harvard Medical School: A spatial code governs olfactory receptor choice and aligns sensory maps in the nose and brain, Cell (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2026.03.051

Also: Spatial Organization and Detection of Social Odors in Mouse Primary Olfactory System, Cell (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2026.03.053. www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(26)00389-2


Wednesday, August 19, 2026

Discoveries in Olfaction and Steganographic Sniffing


When a discovery is made in the smell world, it doesn't make it to the top of your news feed. They're usually hard to explain in the first place, likely hard to discuss with your friends because we do not talk about smells to almost anyone, and the utility of these discoveries is pretty hard to predict, considering the world of smell is kind of frozen in time, like the time back when alchemy experiments were being funded by the Church. That being said, let's talk about smells for a minute.

Also, important note of interest - we're coming for your sniffing behaviors and I mean it. 

Prototype device restores lost smell by teaching the brain to feel odors
Nov 2025, phys.org

Sensory substitution - They developed a system that captures odors using an artificial nose (e-nose) and translates that chemical information into a specific digital code. This code is then passed through an intranasal electrical stimulator (a small magnetic clip) placed on the septum, the wall separating the nostrils, to trigger the trigeminal nerve.

The study authors tested their innovation on 65 people (13 with normal smell and 52 with smell loss) across four experiments. All were able to detect odorant molecules, and most could distinguish between two distinct odors. The device also worked just as well for patients who couldn't smell as it did for healthy people, meaning the trigeminal system is a reliable pathway for transmitting coded signals for everyone.

via Université Claude Bernard Lyon, CNRS, INSERM, Microsystems Laboratory at EPFL, Technische Universität Dresden: Halina B. Stanley et al, Substitution of human olfaction by the trigeminal system, Science Advances (2025). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adu7926


My GLP-1 Medication Changed the Way Perfume Smells to Me
May 2025, Allure via Monnel

Theory 1: Bad feedback - dissonance between the “feel-good neurotransmitters” of the brain — like dopamine and oxytocin — and my olfactory receptors, or what I’m smelling.

Theory 2: Scent memory disruption - Then the brain “decodes” what it’s smelling, like Chanel No. 5 or a rotten egg, but the way you respond to a scent is totally unique. It “typically has to do with an association with memory” 

Theory 3: Scent aversion - “a population of neurons in the hindbrain [the lower part of the brain that connects it to the spinal cord] seem to play a key role in mediating the vast majority” of the appetite suppressant and weight loss effects of the GLP-1 drug. 


Sexual selection: Human odor-based mating preferences do not guarantee gamete-level compatibility
Jun 2025, phys.org
https://phys.org/news/2025-06-sexual-human-odor-based-gamete.html

10 women first ranked the attractiveness and intensity of body odor samples collected from 11 men, followed by an analysis of whether female body odor preferences in these same 110 male–female combinations predicted sperm performance in the presence of follicular fluid. ... and women committed to testing their ovulation to ensure that odor rating occurred during their fertile window.

"Women showed a preference for the body odors of MHC-similar men. However, sperm from MHC-dissimilar men exhibited higher motility when exposed to female follicular fluid, suggesting that the most attractive males may not necessarily always be the most optimal partners in terms of fertilization success".

The results indicate that individual and gamete-level mate choice processes may in fact act in opposing directions, and that gamete-mediated mate choice may have a definitive role in disfavoring genetically incompatible partners from fertilizing oocytes.

via University of Eastern Finland: Annalaura Jokiniemi et al, Female-mediated selective sperm activation may remodel major histocompatibility complex-based mate choice decisions in humans, Heredity (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41437-025-00759-9


One of a kind: Humans have unique breathing 'fingerprints' that may signal health status
Jun 2025, phys.org

Scientists can identify individuals based solely on their breathing patterns with 96.8% accuracy. 

This high-level accuracy remained consistent across multiple retests conducted over a two-year period, rivaling the precision of some voice recognition technologies.

These respiratory fingerprints correlated with a person's body mass index, sleep-wake cycle, levels of depression and anxiety, and even behavioral traits. For example, participants who scored relatively higher on anxiety questionnaires had shorter inhales and more variability in the pauses between breaths during sleep.

via Noam Sobel of the Weizmann Institute of Science: Humans Have Nasal Respiratory Fingerprints, Current Biology (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.05.008. 


Changes in female body odor during ovulation elicit measurable reactions in men, finds study
Jul 2025, phys.org

I was at first laughing because this was done in Japan and on Japanese women who tend to not have what most people call "body odor" due to the prevalence of the ABCC1 gene among the East Asian population, but then, direct from the article, "The odour emitted from the backs of women in the ovulatory phase increased testosterone secretion in men. The odour emitted from the chest reduced cortisol secretion in men."

via University of Tokyo: Human ovulatory phase-increasing odors cause positive emotions and stress-suppressive effects in males, iScience (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113087


Radio waves amp up smell without surgery or chemicals
Aug 2025, phys.org

Unlike traditional aroma-based therapy, which indirectly treats smell loss by exposing the patient to chemicals, radio waves can directly target the part of our brain responsible for smell, without causing pain.

In the study, the team asked volunteers with a healthy sense of smell to sit while a small radio antenna was placed near, but not touching, their forehead. For five minutes, this antenna gently sent out radio waves to reach the smell-related nerves deep in the brain.

Before and after the short treatment, the authors tested how well the patient could smell very faint odors, like diluted alcohol or fruit scents, using pen-shaped odor dispensers called Sniffin' Sticks. They also recorded the patients' brain signals to see how active their smell nerves were.

The team found that their method improved subjects' sense of smell for over a week after just one treatment.

via Hanyang University in South Korea: Noncontact radiofrequency stimulation to the olfactory nerve of human subjects, APL Bioengineering (2025). DOI: 10.1063/5.0275613


While it may go unnoticed, loss of smell may linger for years after COVID-19
Sep 2025, phys.org

(They used UPSIT-Sniffin Sticks)

Led by the National Institutes of Health's RECOVER initiative and supported by its Clinical Science Core at NYU Langone Health, a team of researchers from across the country explored a link between the coronavirus that causes COVID-19 and hyposmia—the reduced ability to smell.

The results revealed that 80% of participants who reported a change in their smelling ability after having COVID-19 earned low scores on a clinical scent-detection test taken about two years later. Of this group, 23% were severely impaired or had entirely lost their sense of smell.

Notably, 66% of infected participants who did not notice any smelling issues scored abnormally low on the evaluation as well, the authors say. [Because people don't even know they can smell in the first place, this sounds crazy but unfortunately it's true - people born without the sense of smell tend to live several years, sometimes into adulthood, before ever realizing they have no sense of smell.]

...60% of uninfected participants who did not report olfactory problems also tested poorly during the clinical evaluation. [Which is the upsit?]

via NYU Langone, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Howard University, Massachusetts General Hospital, University of Arizona: Olfactory Dysfunction After SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the RECOVER Adult Cohort, JAMA Network Open (2025). DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.33815


(This is nuts) People's sniffing behaviors predict what they are smelling, study shows
Dec 2025, phys.org

NEMO - neural encoding models of olfaction dataset - 12,000 experimental trials during which three human participants were asked to smell 160 different odors inside an MRI scanner.

Researchers found that sniffing behaviors contained enough information to decode the identity of odors. Moreover, perceptual properties of odors appeared to be reflected in subtle sniffing pattern variations.

via Dartmouth College, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine: Vivek Sagar et al, The human brain modulates sniffs according to fine-grained perceptual features of odours. Nature Human Behaviour(2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41562-025-02327-x


Gut bacteria may influence social behavior through smell
Mar 2026, phys.org

When gut bacteria break down choline-rich foods, such as eggs and meat, they generate TMA as a byproduct. The body's liver then converts TMA (trimethylamine, smells like rotten fish, ask your UTI about that) into an odorless metabolite. But in adult male mice, testosterone suppresses the liver enzyme that typically neutralizes TMA, allowing it to accumulate in urine.

When the researchers blocked gut bacteria from producing TMA, aggression dropped. When they restored the chemical, aggressive behavior returned.

In another experiment, the researchers treated young mice, which typically do not exhibit aggression, with TMA. Adult mice responded by biting and fighting — treating the younger mice like rivals.

via Northwestern University: Annika Cichy et al, A microbiome-derived olfactory signal regulates inter-male aggression and social dominance in mice, Current Biology (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2026.03.009. 


Wednesday, July 8, 2026

The Smell of Risk


Environmental Disparities and Olfactory Aesthetics
Hsuan L Hsu, NYU Press, 2020

Image credit: "Sweat" Peter De Cupere Olfactory Performance Art circa 2012

They definitely had me with that title, I'll admit. But after reading, I conclude it's just not my thing. I try to withhold my frustration with the author, the editor, the publisher, I don't know, whoever might be at fault when you're more than halfway through a book you really wanted to be really good but now you feel like you should go read a book on the science of deception instead because you've been duped.

This book is mostly about what I'll call racism, but through an olfactory lens. But I want something more. Or maybe just something else. Maybe it's me; maybe I'm the one without the PhD (I am), but sometimes I lose my patience for these circular ramblings, the circle-jerking, fart-huffing, pathological neologistic echo chamber of your own super sub-category of knowledge, where you've squeezed yourself so far into your niche that almost nobody else can criticize you because they have no idea what the f you're talking about. (The fact that you're making up half the words you use to describe said subject kind of works to that effect naturally.)

It's doubly ironic then, that here I am, a person who very accidentally, and non-academically, has a background in both olfaction and industrial hygiene, to read this work, otherwise insulated from criticism by sheer epistemological remoteness. My problem is that some of the material here is problematic from a public health point of view. There are arguments in this book that we should allow something like incense burning in the workplace because it's meaningful for certain people of certain cultures, and because it's not fair that colonizers took away the ability for us to express ourselves, to cope with our lives, and it's things like this that make racism and colonialism so bad. But again as a public health specialist, I have to clarify - are we saying that we should allow people to conduct relatively uncontrolled combustion activites indoors, with other people around, and in a workplace no less, which means some of those occupants are there not by choice but because they need to pay their bills, because some of these people miss being able to do that back where they come from? So I see less of a blurred line, a clear line in fact, pretty obvious, where things are "ok" vs "not ok". Exposing the public to partial combustion by-products indoors is not ok. I can't decide whether it's not racist NOT to do that, or to prohibit others from not doing that, so I have to leave that up to you, the public, and to academicians who use words that don't exist to reinforce their ideas.

All that being said, there are some interesting things in here: 
  • Smells that don't smell (the "scentlessness" of the South Pole that inspired a soap manufacturer) and smells used to deodorize (soap).
  • "Deodorization" is what seems to be the concurrent theme; could have been the title. 
  • Somewhat like myself, perhaps like so many people who became fascinated by smell, the author's interest begins after one night of sleeping in an apartment freshly painted. It messes up his sense of smell, a partial anosmia that lasts years, but brings so much attention to an otherwise invisible sense. 
  • Kant's Perfumed Handkerchief - Kant is infamous for his either vicious abhorrence or total ignorance of the sense of smell, but here he betrays a bit of his ... intolerance for others (then again is this just support for good manners; throughout the whole book this is a recurring thought in my head) ... "The man who pulls his perfumed handkerchief from his pocket treats all around to it whether they like it or not, and compels them, if they want to breathe at all, to be parties in the enjoyment. --Kant's Critique of Judgement
  • [By the way, 14 pages in and we're at footnote 51, just saying]
  • Sherlock Holmes often used smell in his investigations
  • The Merck manual calls hyperosmia psychosomatic [but it is? not sure the point here]
  • The American Southwest was in part settled by health-seeking migrants fleeing tuberculosis p52
  • For conservation purposes, museum air is standardized by UNESCO, ICOM the International Council of Museums and IIC the International Institute for the Conservation of Museum Objects, and see the book The Museum Environment by Butterworth 1978 p88-90
  • "Occularcentric" museum experience; "derecognition" of smell; "toposmia" is how a place enters our bodies through smell; "breathers" are participants in an olfactory art exhibit not like viewers or something passive like audience
  • He mentions plenty of good olfactory artists: Boris Raux, Anicka Yi, Peter de Cupere (p87), but let's focus here: Sean Raspet is an olfactory artist, and this is nuts - Micro-Encapsulated Surface Coating 2014 - he puts a Summa canister in a gallery for a week, analyzes the ingested olfactory profile, then recreates it using the same chemicals found there, and releases it back into the gallery via a scratch-n-sniff paint that he made and put on the walls, all the while a negative air machine sucks out the present odors of the gallery. ... Very, very cool. But I'm suspicious as to whether the output = the input. Like there are too many other variables besides the molecular components, the most significant of which is the simple fact that for smells, concentration can change a smell to something otherwise unrecognizable. For example, skatole, the smell of shit, is added to perfume, because at very small amounts, and when mixed with the right ensemble, it smells friggin great. But then there's air movement, diurnal changes in building performance, I mean the variables are kind of endless. The idea is just totally nuts, in a good way, but the actual results; I'm skeptical.
  • And here is an example of my problem with what I might try to call academia. Maybe it's got something to do with the humanities scholars, and not being required to think like an engineer or a scientist, or maybe even a lawyer. Like you will hear things being said as facts with no justification about how this or that causes this or that, but simply by the sheer fact that they came up with the association, and it sounds great as a series of words strung together, so it must be true? The author says, "[The exhibit] simulates hyperosmia, artificially enhancing visitors' olfactory sensitivity to the gallery air." (p101) But how does he know that's what happens? It's what the art tries to do, what it wants to do, but we don't know what it did to people unless we go and ask them, or at least monitor their behavior somewhat, and there's no mention of any of that. So again I would ask, how do you know it "enhances visitors' sensitivity"? What if they don't even notice? You want it to do that and the artist wants it to do that, but neither of you has any say, and apparently no supporting evidence. And for what it's worth, and for at least a few very different and mostly unrelated reasons, I don't think most people even notice, so I don't think it did "enhance" anything except your own perception of your own thoughts, because that seems to be what a lot of this is about. Then again, I am not the one with the PhD, granted. 
  • Now here's some cool insight; but I'm not sure it belongs to the author originally - Kate McLean's Smell Maps circa 2014 is cultural preference (ie racist) because she calls "dried fish" and "cabbage" as bad smells, but they come from Asian neighborhoods, and to Asians, they aren't bad. (I might have to argue, weakly, that rotten fish and rotten cabbage are like two of the most representative bad smells of all, and so, only with the addition of "rotten", the author's argument fails.) p113
  • Many of the references cited here are so tedious; they aren't books or articles but what seem to be random scraps of paper that make the citation style look like an alien language; I guess part of the point of doing esoteric research is to attempt to uncover some of this stuff that would otherwise be lost to history; but for much of this I'm left with the thought that maybe it should be lost. Also, I must be outdated because there seems to be a new way to do in-text citations, so that "Braiding Sweetgrass" looks like (BrS, 121) not (Braiding Sweetgrass, 121)
  • There is an Israeli firm Odortec that makes "skunk water" for crowd control, but it didn't work in India. p159
  • Paul Gauguin's memoir Noa Noa 1901 means "fragrant" in Tahitian
  • Smudging, or incense I suppose, he calls "air conditioning" and a way of decolonializing smells; and it's kind of the opposite of the use of mustard gas on uncooperative populations
  • "Atmospheric engineering and olfactory aesthetic interventions" p182
  • Certain cultures want to use incense for spiritual and communal purposes but they can't because of smoke detectors, and this is where I'm like hold on, we need to stop somewhere, and this would be a good place to stop. Smoke detectors as systematic and persistent instruments of oppression? You're not getting a lot of people on your side with that argument, not anyone who's loved one's have died in a fire, not anyone who's had to save people's lives from a fire, and not anyone who's job it is to be responsible for public safety with respect to fire. p185
  • Curators at the Museum of Natural History Department of Anthropology provided a space in the storage facility for Native American visitors who wish to smudge sacred objects in the collection (and interesting in light of the fact that much of these artifacts were historically dosed with insecticide, which continues to be a persistent source of occupational health hazard for museum workers) p185
  • At the Natural Museum of the American Indian (is this the Smithsonian in New York City?), the Human Remains Vault is smudged with a mixture of tobacco, sage, sweetgrass, and cedar every week. 
  • And ... certain museum practices like bagging, freezing, or low oxygen may be inappropriate for suffocating the living entity in the artifact.
  • The idea of fragrance-free workplaces (also racist) vs working next to a highway; so the idea of forcing people to be exposed to dangerous environmental conditions like traffic pollution, while also prohibiting them from wearing perfume, is messed up. I like it when people express themselves, even if it don't like it myself, because I support creative expression, and I like perfume, but I also understand the need for and desire of a healthy workplace, so I'm stuck on this one.  
  • The Yes Men Exxon Climate Victim Candles, omfg: They told 300 oilmen at Canada's largest oil conference that the real solution to climate change was to turn everyone who dies into fuel so that the all-important free market could continue to work well past doomsday. As volunteers passed out flesh-scented candles, a funeral tribute played for an Exxon janitor named Reggie Watts, who had graciously donated his body to be turned into candles as a test of the Vivoleum concept. (He was played by the actual Reggie Watts) ... good luck finding this video on your own, the United States government straight banned this permanently from the internet, well as best it could; you will absolutely not find this via a google search or on youtube. I can't even find it on the porn sites. The only place it's hosted is the Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/The.Yes.Men.Fix.The.World.P2P.Edition.2010.Xvid
  • And Anicka Yi's use of a stink bomb during a high profile meeting of these executives to scare the absolute living shit out of the big money assholes who were responsible for Bhopal. ... they thought they themselves were now being poisoned. I don't care about their feelings, that is genius, and that is what art is for.