Showing posts with label human behavior. Show all posts
Showing posts with label human behavior. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 19, 2026

Discoveries in Olfaction and Steganographic Sniffing


When a discovery is made in the smell world, it doesn't make it to the top of your news feed. They're usually hard to explain in the first place, likely hard to discuss with your friends because we do not talk about smells to almost anyone, and the utility of these discoveries is pretty hard to predict, considering the world of smell is kind of frozen in time, like the time back when alchemy experiments were being funded by the Church. That being said, let's talk about smells for a minute.

Also, important note of interest - we're coming for your sniffing behaviors and I mean it. 

Prototype device restores lost smell by teaching the brain to feel odors
Nov 2025, phys.org

Sensory substitution - They developed a system that captures odors using an artificial nose (e-nose) and translates that chemical information into a specific digital code. This code is then passed through an intranasal electrical stimulator (a small magnetic clip) placed on the septum, the wall separating the nostrils, to trigger the trigeminal nerve.

The study authors tested their innovation on 65 people (13 with normal smell and 52 with smell loss) across four experiments. All were able to detect odorant molecules, and most could distinguish between two distinct odors. The device also worked just as well for patients who couldn't smell as it did for healthy people, meaning the trigeminal system is a reliable pathway for transmitting coded signals for everyone.

via Université Claude Bernard Lyon, CNRS, INSERM, Microsystems Laboratory at EPFL, Technische Universität Dresden: Halina B. Stanley et al, Substitution of human olfaction by the trigeminal system, Science Advances (2025). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adu7926


My GLP-1 Medication Changed the Way Perfume Smells to Me
May 2025, Allure via Monnel

Theory 1: Bad feedback - dissonance between the “feel-good neurotransmitters” of the brain — like dopamine and oxytocin — and my olfactory receptors, or what I’m smelling.

Theory 2: Scent memory disruption - Then the brain “decodes” what it’s smelling, like Chanel No. 5 or a rotten egg, but the way you respond to a scent is totally unique. It “typically has to do with an association with memory” 

Theory 3: Scent aversion - “a population of neurons in the hindbrain [the lower part of the brain that connects it to the spinal cord] seem to play a key role in mediating the vast majority” of the appetite suppressant and weight loss effects of the GLP-1 drug. 


Sexual selection: Human odor-based mating preferences do not guarantee gamete-level compatibility
Jun 2025, phys.org
https://phys.org/news/2025-06-sexual-human-odor-based-gamete.html

10 women first ranked the attractiveness and intensity of body odor samples collected from 11 men, followed by an analysis of whether female body odor preferences in these same 110 male–female combinations predicted sperm performance in the presence of follicular fluid. ... and women committed to testing their ovulation to ensure that odor rating occurred during their fertile window.

"Women showed a preference for the body odors of MHC-similar men. However, sperm from MHC-dissimilar men exhibited higher motility when exposed to female follicular fluid, suggesting that the most attractive males may not necessarily always be the most optimal partners in terms of fertilization success".

The results indicate that individual and gamete-level mate choice processes may in fact act in opposing directions, and that gamete-mediated mate choice may have a definitive role in disfavoring genetically incompatible partners from fertilizing oocytes.

via University of Eastern Finland: Annalaura Jokiniemi et al, Female-mediated selective sperm activation may remodel major histocompatibility complex-based mate choice decisions in humans, Heredity (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41437-025-00759-9


One of a kind: Humans have unique breathing 'fingerprints' that may signal health status
Jun 2025, phys.org

Scientists can identify individuals based solely on their breathing patterns with 96.8% accuracy. 

This high-level accuracy remained consistent across multiple retests conducted over a two-year period, rivaling the precision of some voice recognition technologies.

These respiratory fingerprints correlated with a person's body mass index, sleep-wake cycle, levels of depression and anxiety, and even behavioral traits. For example, participants who scored relatively higher on anxiety questionnaires had shorter inhales and more variability in the pauses between breaths during sleep.

via Noam Sobel of the Weizmann Institute of Science: Humans Have Nasal Respiratory Fingerprints, Current Biology (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.05.008. 


Changes in female body odor during ovulation elicit measurable reactions in men, finds study
Jul 2025, phys.org

I was at first laughing because this was done in Japan and on Japanese women who tend to not have what most people call "body odor" due to the prevalence of the ABCC1 gene among the East Asian population, but then, direct from the article, "The odour emitted from the backs of women in the ovulatory phase increased testosterone secretion in men. The odour emitted from the chest reduced cortisol secretion in men."

via University of Tokyo: Human ovulatory phase-increasing odors cause positive emotions and stress-suppressive effects in males, iScience (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113087


Radio waves amp up smell without surgery or chemicals
Aug 2025, phys.org

Unlike traditional aroma-based therapy, which indirectly treats smell loss by exposing the patient to chemicals, radio waves can directly target the part of our brain responsible for smell, without causing pain.

In the study, the team asked volunteers with a healthy sense of smell to sit while a small radio antenna was placed near, but not touching, their forehead. For five minutes, this antenna gently sent out radio waves to reach the smell-related nerves deep in the brain.

Before and after the short treatment, the authors tested how well the patient could smell very faint odors, like diluted alcohol or fruit scents, using pen-shaped odor dispensers called Sniffin' Sticks. They also recorded the patients' brain signals to see how active their smell nerves were.

The team found that their method improved subjects' sense of smell for over a week after just one treatment.

via Hanyang University in South Korea: Noncontact radiofrequency stimulation to the olfactory nerve of human subjects, APL Bioengineering (2025). DOI: 10.1063/5.0275613


While it may go unnoticed, loss of smell may linger for years after COVID-19
Sep 2025, phys.org

(They used UPSIT-Sniffin Sticks)

Led by the National Institutes of Health's RECOVER initiative and supported by its Clinical Science Core at NYU Langone Health, a team of researchers from across the country explored a link between the coronavirus that causes COVID-19 and hyposmia—the reduced ability to smell.

The results revealed that 80% of participants who reported a change in their smelling ability after having COVID-19 earned low scores on a clinical scent-detection test taken about two years later. Of this group, 23% were severely impaired or had entirely lost their sense of smell.

Notably, 66% of infected participants who did not notice any smelling issues scored abnormally low on the evaluation as well, the authors say. [Because people don't even know they can smell in the first place, this sounds crazy but unfortunately it's true - people born without the sense of smell tend to live several years, sometimes into adulthood, before ever realizing they have no sense of smell.]

...60% of uninfected participants who did not report olfactory problems also tested poorly during the clinical evaluation. [Which is the upsit?]

via NYU Langone, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Howard University, Massachusetts General Hospital, University of Arizona: Olfactory Dysfunction After SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the RECOVER Adult Cohort, JAMA Network Open (2025). DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.33815


(This is nuts) People's sniffing behaviors predict what they are smelling, study shows
Dec 2025, phys.org

NEMO - neural encoding models of olfaction dataset - 12,000 experimental trials during which three human participants were asked to smell 160 different odors inside an MRI scanner.

Researchers found that sniffing behaviors contained enough information to decode the identity of odors. Moreover, perceptual properties of odors appeared to be reflected in subtle sniffing pattern variations.

via Dartmouth College, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine: Vivek Sagar et al, The human brain modulates sniffs according to fine-grained perceptual features of odours. Nature Human Behaviour(2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41562-025-02327-x


Gut bacteria may influence social behavior through smell
Mar 2026, phys.org

When gut bacteria break down choline-rich foods, such as eggs and meat, they generate TMA as a byproduct. The body's liver then converts TMA (trimethylamine, smells like rotten fish, ask your UTI about that) into an odorless metabolite. But in adult male mice, testosterone suppresses the liver enzyme that typically neutralizes TMA, allowing it to accumulate in urine.

When the researchers blocked gut bacteria from producing TMA, aggression dropped. When they restored the chemical, aggressive behavior returned.

In another experiment, the researchers treated young mice, which typically do not exhibit aggression, with TMA. Adult mice responded by biting and fighting — treating the younger mice like rivals.

via Northwestern University: Annika Cichy et al, A microbiome-derived olfactory signal regulates inter-male aggression and social dominance in mice, Current Biology (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2026.03.009. 


Thursday, October 13, 2022

Headlines in the Smell World


Scientists thought they knew how the nose 'knows,' but new research suggests otherwise
Aug 2022, phys.org

I'm not doing a great job following this development, a reversal rather -- there's apparently some reconsideration that needs to be given to the way odorous molecules activate their respective olfactory receptors. Smell is the most understudied of all our senses, so it should be less of a surprise that one of the foundationary hypotheses of olfactory science needs some fine-tuning: 

G protein signal amplification is actually very low—so low that the probability of an odorant receptor activating just one G protein would be perhaps only 1 in 10,000. Yau said that, as such, the activation level "is very weak."

On a sidenote, what really stands out to me from this article is that the rhodopsin in the photosensitive cells on your retina (and all over your body in fact) are so sensitive they can detect a single photon of light. One single photon. And I thought our nose was sensitive. (It is, but for chemicals; the eye, and the photoreceptors in it, are for detecting the electromagnetic radiation beaming through our solar system.)

via Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine: Rong-Chang Li et al, Low signaling efficiency from receptor to effector in olfactory transduction: A quantified ligand-triggered GPCR pathway, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2022). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2121225119



Friends at first sniff: People drawn to others who smell like them
Jun 2022, phys.org

The researchers found that the odor signatures of "click friends" were statistically more closely matched than odors between non-friends.
This study was done using the T-shirt test, an old trusty in smell science. 

I can't figure out which is more interesting here. The word "click friends" is pretty cool, never heard it. But this one is good: "Nonhuman terrestrial mammals constantly sniff themselves and each other and, based on this, decide who is friend or foe," wrote a group of researchers led by Inbal Ravreby at Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel.

"I don't sniff myself; I am not an animal; gross" as you completely obliviously brush your hair away from your face, or scratch your temple. The study that proved our absolute inability to avoid smelling our own hands (and the hands of everyone we meet, by way of our own hands that shook theirs) found that BEFORE the study even started, while people were still in the waiting room, they had their hand ready next to their nose 22% of the time! (see older post and the article itself). Filthy animals!

via Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel: Inbal Ravreby et al, There is chemistry in social chemistry, Science Advances (2022). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abn0154


People who consider olfaction important and actively sniff other's odors have stronger sexual desire
Aug 2022, phys.org

This study is based on questionnaires given to Chinese college students, and recall that there is a general understanding in the smell world that Asian people tend to not have the same scent-emitting glands as non-Asians; in other words, the deodorant market doesn't work very well in China. After their initial findings however, they started over and sent the same questionnaires to college students in both the U.S. and in India, and after all that:

  • Students who reported giving high value to olfaction or who actively sniffed other people also reported having a stronger sexual desire than others who responded.
  • Women tended to place more emphasis on smell than men, and reported lower levels of sexual desire in general.
  • Men in India reported stronger sexual desire than those in China and the U.S., and they also reported placing more importance on olfaction.  

A final thought -- culture in some ways can be a stronger mediator for olfactory perception than biology or genetics. Science like this is great, but it's only s very small piece of the full picture. I'm thinking of how the Marshmallow Test fell apart in a recent study because they considered that Japanese kids are conditioned to wait for everyone to be ready to eat at the dinnertable, and U.S. kids are not. 

via Southern Medical University in China and Technische Universität Dresden in Germany: Zi-lin Li et al, Sniffing of Body Odors and Individual Significance of Olfaction Are Associated with Sexual Desire: A Cross-Cultural Study in China, India, and the USA, Archives of Sexual Behavior (2022). DOI: 10.1007/s10508-022-02398-1


Rapid loss of smell predicts dementia and smaller brain areas linked to Alzheimer's
Jul 2022, phys.org
 
(But how about their sexual desire??)

via University of Chicago Medicine: Rapid olfactory decline during aging predicts dementia and GMV loss in AD brain regions, Alzheimer s & Dementia (2022). DOI: 10.1002/alz.12717


New study reveals where memory fragments are stored
Jul 2022, phys.org

This is about memory recall, the way we access memories stored in our brains, and it certainly does change the olfactory science, since we tend to consider olfaction as being deeply connected to our autobiographical memory via the hippocampus, which it is, but this suggests there are more olfactory details being stored in the prefrontal cortex than we thought:

While the overall experience is stored in the hippocampus, the brain structure long considered the seat of memory, the individual details are parsed and stored elsewhere, in the prefrontal cortex. This separation ensures that, in the future, exposure to any individual cue is sufficient to activate the prefrontal cortex, which then accesses the hippocampus for recall of the whole memory.

via Laboratory of Neural Dynamics and Cognition at Rockefeller University and Weill Cornell Medicine: Priyamvada Rajasethupathy, Prefrontal feature representations drive memory recall, Nature (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04936-2

Friday, August 20, 2021

On Handshakes and Animal Behavior

AKA Olfactory Sampling

Non-human primates Mark Zuckerberg and Pope Francis shaking hands and about to smell each other's chemosignals once they start covertly raising their hands near their face in about 20 seconds from now.

After you shake someone's hand, you smell your own hand. Sometimes the shaking hand, and sometimes the opposite, depending on the gender match. They call it "olfactory sampling," but we call it "smelling your fingers," and despite its being in poor taste while in public view, we do it almost neurotically, albeit covertly -- so covertly that even we don't notice ourselves doing it. 

I'm surprised this didn't resurface at the outset of the pandemic when we were all paying so much attention to how often we touch our face. In fact, the authors set us up thus:
Consistent with previous studies (Nicas and Best, 2008), we observed that humans often bring their hands to their noses. Of 153 subjects, 85 (55.55%) touched their nose with their hand at least once during baseline before the greet. Idle subjects had a hand (either right or left) at the vicinity of their nose for 22.14% of the time. (that's a lot of time!)
But this isn't just about how you can't keep your own hands off yourself:
Whereas facial self-touching has been considered a form of displacement stress response (Troisi, 2002), akin to rodent grooming, the novel framework we propose here for this behavior is that of olfactory sampling.
In this really carefully controlled study, they videotaped  hundreds of people after shaking hands with a greeter at the lab, and even outfitted the subjects tubes near their nose to monitor their sniffing behavior. The results were "unequivocal," and remind us that we are in fact animals, sniffing up a storm:
We found that humans often sniff their own hands*, and selectively increase this behavior after handshake. After handshakes within gender, subjects increased sniffing of their own right shaking hand by more than 100%. In contrast, after handshakes across gender, subjects increased sniffing of their own left non-shaking hand by more than 100%. Tainting participants with unnoticed odors significantly altered the effects, thus verifying their olfactory nature. Thus, handshaking may functionally serve active yet subliminal social chemosignaling, which likely plays a large role in ongoing human behavior.

*For example, by touching their nose when they were in the room on their own; ... Criterion for scoring was any application of a hand to the face, as long as touching was under the eyebrows and above the chin; n=271 down to 153.
And later on in the report, things get even more complicated:
The body odor of some of the experimenters was tainted by perfumes or gender-specific odors. Volunteers who shook hands with these tainted individuals behaved differently; when the experimenter was tainted with perfume the volunteers spent more time sniffing their own hands, but when the experimenter was tainted with a gender-specific odor they spent less time sniffing of their own hands. This shows that different smells influenced the hand sniffing behavior of the volunteers.
Now that you know, you might notice yourself doing it constantly. What would be really interesting now would be to somehow get some anosmics up in the mix, maybe congenitally, maybe some recent long covid anosmics, and see how these numbers change?

Notes:
Frumin I, et al. [incl Noam Sobel] A social chemosignaling function for human handshaking. eLife. 2015 Mar 03;4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345842/