Showing posts with label disambiguation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label disambiguation. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Odor Identification vs Odor Perception

 


Scientists reveal chemical structural analysis in neural computations that allow us to identify odors
Mar 2024, phys.org

via Institute of Psychology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences: Yuting Ye et al, Decomposition of an odorant in olfactory perception and neural representation, Nature Human Behaviour (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01849-0



Name that odor: Identical odors seem different when given different names
May 2024, phys.org

Participants were given minty and citrusy odors to sniff, which had been labeled with two words; for example, mint-menthol or eucalyptus-menthol. While sniffing, participants were scanned using an ultrahigh-field (7-tesla) functional MRI (fMRI) machine. While MRIs take snapshots of the brain, fMRIs enable researchers to see activity in the brain over time, in this case where in the brain the information about the labeled odors was being processed.

After the scan, participants sniffed the odors again, but this time presented in pairs, and then rated how similar or different they thought the odors were from each other. In this second round, the odors and their labels were either the same, or two identical odors were given different labels, or different odors were given the same name.

"We were surprised to discover the clear effects of labels on the participants' ratings of odors. We could also see from the fMRI results how the semantic context, the word labels used, influenced odor-coding activity in the piriform cortex, a key part of the primary olfactory cortex for processing smell."

Results showed that participants reported a greater difference between odors when two identical odors were given different names, than when they were labeled the same. The fMRI data showed that some parts of the piriform cortex were affected by the words used to label the odors, while other areas were more affected by the odor itself.

The researchers suggest that this may be because areas affected by words would differ from those affected by odors within the primary olfactory cortex, but further research is needed to confirm this. The team also noticed a significant connection between the areas within the piriform cortex affected by words and other regions of the brain involved in language processing.

via University of Tokyo: Toshiki Okumura et al, Semantic context‐dependent neural representations of odors in the human piriform cortex revealed by 7T MRI, Human Brain Mapping (2024). DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26681


Detecting odors on the edge: Researchers decipher how insects smell more with less
May 2024, phys.org

Wiring diagram of the fly nose; and since olfaction is the ideal model for how the brain works, because of its severe simplicity - 

Previous investigations of the odor processing system in flies focused on the central brain as the main hub for processing odor signals. But the new study shows that the effectiveness of the insect's sensory capabilities relies on a "pre-processing" stage in the periphery of their sensory system, which prepares the odor signals for computations that occur later in the central brain region.

Flies smell through their antennae, which are replete with sensory hairs that detect elements of the environment around them. Each sensory hair usually features two olfactory receptor neurons. "The signals carried by the wires interfere with each other through electromagnetic interactions," and helps flies quickly compute the "gist" of the odor's meaning.

"Remarkably, our work shows that the optimal odor blend—the precise ratio to which each sensory hair is most sensitive—is defined by the genetically predetermined size difference between the coupled olfactory neurons," said Aljadeff, a faculty member in the School of Biological Sciences. "Our work highlights the far-reaching algorithmic role of the sensory periphery for the processing of both innately meaningful and learned odors in the central brain."

via University of California San Diego: Palka Puri et al, Peripheral preprocessing in Drosophila facilitates odor classification, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2024). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2316799121


Another step towards decoding smell: Investigating the neuronal mechanisms of human odor perception
Oct 2024, phys.org

Yes, thank you once again, epilepsy: 

The research group has now succeeded for the first time in recording the activity of individual nerve cells during smelling, by monitoring epilepsy patients.

While the activity of nerve cells in the olfactory cortex most accurately predicted which scent was smelled, neuronal activity in the hippocampus was able to predict whether scents were correctly identified. Only nerve cells in the amygdala, a region involved in emotional processing, reacted differently depending on whether a scent was perceived as pleasant or unpleasant.

In a next step, the researchers investigated the connection between the perception of scents and images. To do this, they presented the participants in the Bonn study with the matching images for each odor, for example, the scent and later a photo of a banana, and examined the reaction of the neurons. Surprisingly, nerve cells in the primary olfactory cortex responded not only to scents, but also to images.

via Department of Epileptology at University Hospital of Bonn: Marcel S. Kehl et al, Single-neuron representations of odours in the human brain, Nature (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08016-5


Humans can distinguish odors with millisecond precision
Oct 2024, phys.org

Human olfactory perception can detect fine chemical changes within the duration of a single sniff.

A unique sniff-triggered device that controls odor delivery with a precision of 18 milliseconds created temporal odor mixtures, presenting two odors one after the other, tested with 229 participants across five experiments to see if they could distinguish these mixtures. 

When two odor compounds, A and B, were presented in different orders, participants could tell the difference when the delay between the compounds was just 60 milliseconds.

via Institute of Psychology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences: Wen Zhou, Human olfactory perception embeds fine temporal resolution within a single sniff, Nature Human Behaviour (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01984-8.

Friday, November 17, 2017

Why You Probably Don’t Know What Musk Really Smells Like


One of the big dogs of the perfume world is also a powerhouse of confusion. What the hell is musk? Do you know? Are you sure?

First, let’s disambiguate the basics. Musky and Musty are not the same thing. Musky is kind of like an animal smell – warm, sexy, intoxicating. Musty is related to moldy, it’s the smell of a dark hamper. Wet and dark, that’s musty. Thing is, body odor can be both musky AND musty, and this is one of the places where the two get intertwined. We can go on and on with this, because there’s this thing I call ‘river musk,’ which is absolutely intoxicating, to me at least, and is the by-product of stuff that lives in the river. Oceans have it too, but it tends to be mixed with dead fish. It’s a secondary metabolite, a kind of seaweed pheromone, which means it’s very similar to animal musk in that it’s a pheromone/chemosignal, but from plants. And yet, it’s related to wet things.

Parenthetically, body odor is actually not musty, for the most part. Usually it’s your dirty clothes that are musty, because they’ve been sitting in a pile on the floor, dark because they’re balled up, and damp because you just took them off, and your body is warm, and the air around you is less warm, so the water vapor in the air condenses on the clothes…either that or you were sweating just before you took them off. Either way, it’s your clothes that smell musty. That being said, we should also note that your armpits can get musty for the same reasons (it’s pretty dark in there). That isn’t what we call body odor, however.

Okay, so we got that out of the way. Sort of. Now for the anosmia part. Anosmia means you can’t smell something. Half the population is anosmic to something, and there are more people anosmic to musk than most other smells. Musk is a really big molecule, one of the biggest we can smell, and for some reason, bigger molecules tend to be invisible to us, but not in the way other anosmias work. It seems to go in-and-out.

Take the behemoth of the synthetic musks, Iso-E Super, which is so super that a perfume was made with only this as its only ingredient (and for non fragrance enthusiasts, that is totally unheard of). Lots of people can’t smell it. Saskia Wilson-Brown of the Institute for Art and Olfaction gave me a sample. I couldn’t smell it. Then I could. Then I couldn’t again. Anyway, because musk has this problem, or because we have this problem with musk, perfumers tend to use lots of musks in their formulas, to make sure that people will be able to smell at least one of the musks in there.

Next problem – the laundry detergent industry. Musks have this attribute where they do really well in fabrics and with detergents. They hold on for a long time (because they’re so big, as a molecule, among other reasons). They’re all over the world of laundry detergents; just about every laundry detergent smells like musk. But you probably don’t know that. You think that smell is the ‘smell of fresh laundry,’ not that of musk. When I tell people this, they don’t believe me, probably because they would rather not associate the smell of sweaty animal bodies with their freshly-laundered sheets. But alas, there it is: the smell of dirty is now the smell of clean.

What’s worse is that these sheets eventually end up in a dark hamper, and smell musty as well as musky. And so now you’re totally screwed. 

Wednesday, October 18, 2017

Wörter und Sachen

Annoying Orange

Wörter und Sachen means "Words and Things" in German. It refers to a movement in Germany/Austria, in the early 20th century, that insisted we use the etymology of words to study the cultural products named by those words.

It’s also a 1959 book by Ernst Gellner* titled Words and Things: An Examination Of, and an Attack On, Linguistic Philosophy.

The study of the language of smells requires a most astute clarification of the words from the things, which is made most difficult by the fact that smells are the things their words describe. The smell of an orange is an orange. The color of an orange is not. The color of anything is instead white light being reflected off of a surface, the color being the portion of that white spectrum not absorbed into the surface. So the color of a thing is almost like the opposite of the thing.

*Gellner is a personal favorite of mine; I have many posts on my other blog inspired by him or in reference to another work of his, Plough, Sword and Book (1988).



Friday, July 22, 2016

Disambiguator Supreme

 aka Common Misperceptions in the World of Smell


Polymathic artist/scientist Elena Vosnaki keeps a very different kind of perfume site. It focuses as much on the raw materials of fragrance and their omnicategorical contexts as much as the fragrances themselves.

Vosnaki authored one post in particular that is so informative to the curious nose that I wish I could add it as an appendix to my book. It is a breakdown of the "vocabulary of scent," a lexigraph connecting chemical names, perfume notes, and everyday descriptors for so many of the smells that surround us in our daily lives.

As I point out repeatedly in Hidden Scents, there is no such thing as a language of smell, and for such a variety of reasons as to require a book of explanation. From the way the smells enter our minds and the language parts of it, to the lack of general public discourse about olfactory experience, to the lack of intellectual property protections on fragrance, which severely limits public access to information about the ingredients of fragrances, for all of these reasons, it is so difficult to talk about smells and to think about them. Additionally, because this language is usurped by chemistry, which is too complex for the layperson to use, and by advertising, which relies on prestidigitation of experiential cues, any information we do get about smells is clouded by confusion, superstition and outright dirty data.

So what Perfume Shrine does here is great – she has generated her list in response to user comments by regular people, confused people, curious people. She takes that list and clarifies and disambiguates a few dozen terms, or odor entities as they might be called, from the smell of nail polish to play-doh to "barnyard." I wish that this list could be posted in every kindergarten room in the world; one generation may be all it takes to dispel from our society this Lingua Anosmia.

“In the end, getting to know the vocabulary of scent not only facilitates a common language reference among fellow fragrance enthusiasts, but also enriches the experience itself, much like getting to know the parameters of art critique enhances the appreciation of art itself.”

Please check this out, if you've ever wondered, "What is that smell?" or "Why does that girl smell like cat piss?" (hint: it's blackcurrant buds in her perfume, not her 15 cats and the piss-soaked apartment she lives in).

Without a doubt, and as with anything else, the more you know, the more you notice. Inform yourself with this little lexicon and watch as you slowly become a Sherlock Holmes of scent.

 What Smells like Nail Polish/ Metal/ Sweat/ Horses/ Hairspray/ Burnt Toast/ Baby Powder/Dirty Socks etc?
-Perfume Shrine, Feb 2011